Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Immunology

Fig. 3

From: CD19+CD24hiCD38hi regulatory B cells deficiency revealed severity and poor prognosis in patients with sepsis

Fig. 3

Low frequencies of Bregs were associated with an increased risk of septic shock development in patients with sepsis. A The Bregs in sepsis patients that did not develop septic shock versus those that developed septic shock. B The absolute count of Bregs in sepsis patients that did not develop septic shock versus those that developed septic shock. C Fraction of septic shock patients in Bregs high (%Bregs > 2.204%) patients versus that in Bregs low (%Bregs < 2.204%) patients. D Frequency and F absolute number of Bregs in sepsis patients versus septic shock patients, subdivided into bacterial, viral and fungal types. Two-tailed t test with unequal variance or Kruskal–Wallis test. *p < 0.05

Back to article page