Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content
Fig. 6 | BMC Immunology

Fig. 6

From: The immune subtypes and landscape of sarcomas

Fig. 6

Immune landscape of sarcoma. A Immune landscape of sarcoma. Each point represents a patient, and the immune subtypes are color-coded. The horizontal axis represents the first principal component (PC1), and the vertical axis represents the second principal component (PC2). B Heatmap for the estimated enrichment scores of 28 immune cell signatures in two principal components. The lower part of each cell represents the R value of the correlation, the upper part represents the P value of the correlation, and significant cells have a significant mark (asterisk). Positive and negative correlations are located to the left and right of the 0 axis, respectively. For the P value, the median value of the division is 1.3 (i.e., − log10(0.05)). If the P value < 0.05, the corresponding color gradient is purple, and the green gradient represents a P value > 0.05. C Immune landscape of the subsets of each sarcoma immune subtype. D The estimated enrichment scores of 28 immune cell signatures in the above subsets. E Immune landscape of samples from three extreme locations and their prognostic status. F Kaplan–Meier curves showing the PFS of sarcoma immune subtypes in the SARC cohort from TCGA

Back to article page

BMC Immunology

ISSN: 1471-2172

Contact us